Test Details
Methodology
Basophil Activation Testing is performed, measuring expression of the CD63 surface marker on basophils from whole blood by flow cytometry.1 Multiple potential basophil donors undergo rigorous BAT characterization alongside control samples. Donors with optimal performance are pooled to enhance the reliability and reproducibility of basophil activation assessment, facilitating a more consistent assessment of patients.
Basophil Activation Testing is performed, measuring expression of the CD63 surface marker on basophils from whole blood by flow cytometry. |
Basophil Activation Testing is performed, measuring expression of the CD63 surface marker on basophils from whole blood by flow cytometry.1 Multiple potential basophil donors undergo rigorous BAT characterization alongside control samples. Donors with optimal performance are pooled to enhance the reliability and reproducibility of basophil activation assessment, facilitating a more consistent assessment of patients. |
Result Turnaround Time
7 - 10 days
Turnaround time is defined as the usual number of days from the date of pickup of a specimen for testing to when the result is released to the ordering provider. In some cases, additional time should be allowed for additional confirmatory or additional reflex tests. Testing schedules may vary.
Use
This test measures the extent to which patient serum activates pooled donor basophils in an indirect basophil activation test (PD-BAT for Chronic Urticaria).
|
This test measures the extent to which patient serum activates pooled donor basophils in an indirect basophil activation test (PD-BAT for Chronic Urticaria). |
Special Instructions
This test currently is not approved for use in New York state.
This test currently is not approved for use in New York state. |
Limitations
A positive result does not indicate which autoantibody (anti-IgE, anti-FceRI or anti-FceRII) is present. This test was developed and its performance characteristics determined by Labcorp. It has not been cleared or approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
Footnotes
1. Wills S, Chavez J, Grover A, et al. PD-BAT: A novel approach of pooling basophil donors for expansion of commercial laboratory testing of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. J Immunol Methods. 2024 Jun;529:113679. PubMed 38679364
2. Zuberbier T, Abdul Latiff AH, Abuzakouk M, et al. The international EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria. Allergy. 2022 Mar;77(3):734-766. PubMed 34536239
3. Kolkhir P, Munoz M, Asero R, et al. Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Jun;149(6):1819-1831. PubMed 35667749
4. Kaplan A, Lebwohl M, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Hide M, Armstrong AW, Maurer M. Chronic spontaneous urticaria: focus on pathophysiology to unlock treatment advances. Allergy. 2023 Feb;78(2):389-401. PubMed 36448493
5. Baldini E, Odorisio T, Tuccilli C, et al. Thyroid diseases and skin autoimmunity. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2018 Dec;19(4):311-323. PubMed 29948572
6. Kolkhir P, Borzova E, Grattan C, Asero R, Pogorelov D, Maurer M. Autoimmune comorbidity in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review. Autoimmun Rev. 2017 Dec;16(12):1196-1208. PubMed 29037900
7. Altrichter S, Peter HJ, Pisarevskaja D, Metz M, Martus P, Maurer M. IgE mediated autoallergy against thyroid peroxidase--a novel pathomechanism of chronic spontaneous urticaria? PLoS One. 2011 Apr 12;6(4):e14794. PubMed 21532759
8. Confino-Cohen R, Chodick G, Shalev V, Leshno M, Kimhi O, Goldberg A. Chronic urticaria and autoimmunity: associations found in a large population study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 May;129(5):1307-1313. PubMed 22336078
9. Bracken SJ, Abraham S, MacLeod AS. Autoimmune Theories of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 29;10:627. PubMed 30984191
10. Kaplan AP, Greaves M. Pathogenesis of chronic urticaria. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Jun;39:777-787. PubMed 19400905
11. Kolkhir P, Church MK, Weller K, Metz M, Schmetzer O, Maurer M. Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria: what we know and what we do not know. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jun;139:1772-1781. PubMed 27777182
12. Konstantinou GN, Asero R, Ferrer M, et al. EAACI taskforce position paper: evidence for autoimmune urticaria and proposal for defining diagnostic criteria. Allergy. 2013 Jan;68:27-36. PubMed 23157716
13. Schoepke N, Asero R, Ellrich A, et al. Biomarkers and clinical characteristics of autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria: Results of the PURIST Study. Allergy. 2019 Dec;74(12):2427-2436. PubMed 31228881
14. Sabroe RA, Fiebiger E, Francis DM, et al. Classification of anti-FcεRI and anti-IgE autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria and correlation with disease severity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Sep;110(3):492-499. PubMed 12209101
15. Maurer M, Altrichter S, Schmetzer O, Scheffel J, Church MK, Metz M. Immunoglobulin EMediated Autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2018 Apr 9;9:689. PubMed 29686678
16. Zuberbier T, Ensina LF, Giménez-Arnau A, et al. Chronic urticaria: unmet needs, emerging drugs, and new perspectives on personalised treatment. Lancet. 2024 Jul 27;404(10450):393-404. PubMed 39004090
17. Kolkhir P, Muñoz M, Asero R, et al. Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Jun;149(6):1819-1831. PubMed 35667749
18. Gimenez-Arnau AM, DeMontojoye L, Asero R, et al. The pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria: the role of infiltrating cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jun;9(6):2195-2208. PubMed 33823316
19. Hide M, Kaplan AP. Concise update on the pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Dec;150(6):1403-1404. Epub 2022 Sep 5. PubMed 36070827
20. Asero R, Ferrer M, Kocaturk E, Maurer M. Chronic spontaneous urticaria: the role and relevance of autoreactivity, autoimmunity, and autoallergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Aug;11(8):2302-2308. PubMed 36868473
21. Xiang YK, Kolkhir P, Scheffel J, et al. Most patients with autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria also have autoallergic urticaria, but not ViceVersa. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Aug;11(8):2417-2425.e1. PubMed 36805105
22. Deza G, Bertolín-Colilla M, Sánchez S, et al. Basophil FcɛRI expression is linked to time to omalizumab response in chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jun;141(6):2313-2316. PubMed 29518420
23. Gericke J, Metz M, Ohanyan T, et al. Serum autoreactivity predicts time to response to omalizumab therapy in chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Mar;139(3):1059-1061. PubMed 27838346
24. Morones CA, Ferrucci SM, Moltrasio C, et al. IgG and IgE Autoantibodies to IgE Receptors in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and Their Role in the Response to Omalizumab. J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 3;12(1):378. PubMed 36615181
25. Schroeder JT. Basophils: emerging roles in the pathogenesis of allergic disease. Immunol Rev. 2011 Jul;242(1):144-160. PubMed 21682743
26. Fiebiger E, Hammerschmid F, Stingl G, Maurer D. Anti-FcεRIa autoantibodies in autoimmune-mediated disorders. Identification of a structure-function relationship. J Clin Invest. 1998 Jan 1;101(1):243-251. PubMed 9421487
27. Asero R Tedeschi A, Lorini M, Salimbeni R, Zanoletti T, Miadonna A. Chronic urticaria: novel clinical and serological aspects. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001 Jul;31(7):1105-1110. PubMed 11468002
28. Eckman JA, Hamilton RG, Gober LM, Sterba PM, Saini SS. Basophil phenotypes in chronic idiopathic urticaria in relation to disease activity and autoantibodies. J Invest Dermatol. 2008 Aug;128(8):1956-1963. PubMed 18356810
29. Sahiner UM, Civelek E, Tuncer A, et al. Chronic urticaria: etiology and natural course in children. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011;156(2):224-230. PubMed 21597304
30. Hide M, Francis DM, Grattan CE, et al. Autoantibodies against the high-affinity IgE receptor as a cause of histamine release in chronic urticaria. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jun 3;328(22):1599-1604. PubMed 7683772
31. Sabroe RA, Grattan CE, Francis DM, Barr RM, Black AK, Greaves MW. The autologous serum skin test: a screening test for auto-antibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 1999 Mar;140(3):446-452. PubMed 10233264
32. Konstantinou GN, Asero R, Maurer M, Sabroe RA, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Grattan CEH. EAACI/GA(2)LEN task force consensus report: the autologous serum skin test in urticaria. Allergy. 2009 Sep;64(9):1256-1268. PubMed 19650847
33. Hoffmann HJ, Santos AF, Mayorga C, et al. The clinical utility of basophil activation testing in diagnosis and monitoring of allergic disease. Allergy. 2015 Nov;70(11):1393-1405. PubMed 26198455
34. De Swerdt A, Van Den Keybus C, Kasran A, et al. Detection of basophil-activating IgG autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria by induction of CD 63. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Sep;116(3):662-667. PubMed 16159640
35. Jirapongsananuruk O, Pongpreuksa S, Sangacharoenkit P, Visitsunthorn N, Vichyanond P. Identification of the etiologies of chronic urticaria in children: a prospective study of 94 patients. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010 May;21(3):508-514. PubMed 19555353
36. Greaves MW. Chronic idiopathic urticaria. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Oct;3(5):363-368. PubMed 14501436
37. Kikuchi Y, Kaplan AP. Mechanisms of autoimmune activation of basophils in chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Jun;107(6):1056-1062. PubMed 11398085
38. Fiebiger E, Hammerschmid F, Stingl G, Maurer D. Anti-FcRIa autoantibodies in autoimmune-mediated disorders. Identification of a structure-function relationship. J Clin Invest. 1998 Jan 1;101(1):243-251. PubMed 9421487
39. Tong LJ, Balakrishnan G, Kochan JP, Kinét JP, Kaplan AP. Assessment of autoimmunity in patients with chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Apr;99(4):461-465. PubMed 9111489
40. Taskapan O, Kutlu A, Karabudak O. Evaluation of autologous serum skin test results in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria, allergic/non-allergic asthma or rhinitis and healthy people. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2008 Nov;33(6):754-758. PubMed 18954415
41. Asero R, Pinter E, Tedeschi A. 35 years of autologous serum skin test in chronic spontaneous urticaria: what we know and what we do not know. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Jan;55(1):4-8. PubMed 34904801
42. Fusari A, Colangelo C, Bonifazi F, Antonicelli L. The autologous serum skin test in the follow-up of patients with chronic urticaria. Allergy. 2005 Feb;60(2):256-258. PubMed 15647050
43. D'Auria E, De Amici M, Licari A, et al. Basophil activation test in children with autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria: Is it ready for clinical practice? Immunobiology. 2019 Jan;224(1):30-33. PubMed 30466958
44. Marcelino J, Baumann K, Skov PS, et al What Basophil Testing Tells Us About CSU Patients - Results of the CORSA Study. Front Immunol. 2021 Sep 28;12:742470. PubMed 34650565
45. Platzer MH, Grattan CE, Poulsen LK, Skov PS. Validation of basophil histamine release against the autologous serum skin test and outcome of serum-induced basophil histamine release studies in a large population of chronic urticaria patients. Allergy. 2005 Sep;60(9):1152-1156. PubMed 16076300
46. Rauber MM, Pickert J, Holiangu L, Möbs C, Pfützner W. Functional and phenotypic analysis of basophils allows determining distinct subtypes in patients with chronic urticaria. Allergy. 2017 Dec;72(12):1904-1911. PubMed 28585360
47. Curto-Barredo L, Yelamos J, Gimeno R, Mojal S, Pujol RM, Giménex-Arnau A. Basophil Activation Test identifies the patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria suffering the most active disease. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2016 Oct 4;4(4):441-445. PubMed 27980778
48. Netchiporouk E, Moreau L, Rahme E, Maurer M, Lejtenyi D, Ben-Shoshan M. Positive CD63 Basophil Activation Tests Are Common in Children with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and Linked to High Disease Activity. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2016;171(2):81-88. PubMed 27846634
49. Irinyi B, Gyimesi E, Garaczi E, et al. Extended diagnostic value of autologous serum skin test and basophil CD63 expression assay in chronic urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Mar;168(3):656-658. PubMed 22834727
50. Gentinetta T, Pecaric-Petkovic T, Wan D, et al. Individual IL-3 priming is crucial for consistent in vitro activation of donor basophils in patients with chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Dec;128(6):1227-1234. PubMed 21855127
51. Lourenço FD, Azor MH, Santos JC et al. Activated status of basophils in chronic urticaria leads to interleukin-3 hyper-responsiveness and enhancement of histamine release induced by anti-IgE stimulus. Br J Dermatol. 2008 May;158(5):979-986. PubMed 18341658
52. Yasnowsky KM, Dreskin SC, Efaw B, et al. Chronic urticaria sera increase basophil CD203c expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jun;117(6):1430-1434. PubMed 16751009
53. Szegedi A, Irinyi B, Gál M, et al. Significant correlation between the CD63 assay and the histamine release assay in chronic urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 2006 Jul;155(1):67-75. PubMed 16792754
54. Gyimesi E, Sipka S, Danko K, et al. Basophil CD63 expression assay on highly sensitized atopic donor leukocytes—a useful method in chronic autoimmune urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 2004 Aug;151(2):388-396. PubMed 15327546
55. Ebo DG, Hagendorens MM, Bridts CH, Schuerwegh AJ, De Clerck LS, Stevens WJ. In vitro allergy diagnosis: should we follow the flow? Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Mar;34(3):332-339. PubMed 15005724
56. Wedi B, Novacovic V, Koerner M, Kapp A. Chronic urticaria serum induces histamine release, leukotriene production, and basophil CD63 surface expression—inhibitory effects of anti-inflammatory drugs. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Mar;105(3):552-560. PubMed 10719307
57. Kolkhir P, Kovalkova E, Chernov A, et al. Autoimmune Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Detection with IgG Anti-TPO and Total IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Nov;9(11):4138-4146.e8. PubMed 34363991
58. Monino-Romero S, Hackler Y, Okas TL, et al. Positive basophil tests are linked to high disease activity and other features of autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Aug;11(8):2411-2416. PubMed 37286132
59. Pesqué D, Andrades E, Torres-Bosó P, et al. Relevance of the basophil activation test in a cohort of 240 patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2025 Feb 24;50(3):551-557. PubMed 39412151
60. Palacios T, Stillman L, Borish L, Lawrence M. Lack of basophil CD203c-upregulating activity as an immunological marker to predict response to treatment with omalizumab in patients with symptomatic chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 May-Jun;4(3):529-530. PubMed 26725153
61. Ghazanfar MN, Sand C, Thomsen SF. Effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous or inducible urticaria: evaluation of 154 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2016 Aug;175(2):404-406. PubMed 26972689
62. Cho CB, Stutes SA, Altrich ML, Ardonin SP, Phillips G, Ogbogu PU. Autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria and nonurticarial systemic autoimmune disorders. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Jan;110(1):29-33. PubMed 23244655
63. Weller K, Ohanyan T, Hawro T, et al. Total IgE levels are linked to the response of chronic spontaneous urticaria patients to omalizumab. Allergy. 2018 Dec;73(12):2406-2408. PubMed 30076605
64. Straesser MD, Oliver E, Palacios T, et al. Serum IgE as an immunological marker to predict response to omalizumab treatment in symptomatic chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jul-Aug;6(4):1386-1388. PubMed 29175369
65. Asero R, Ferrucci S, Casazza G, Marzano AV, Gugno M. Total IgE and atopic status in patients with severe chronic spontaneous urticaria unresponsive to omalizumab treatment. Allergy. 2019 Aug;74(8):1561-1563. PubMed 30801715
66. Kaplan A, Ferrer M, Bernstein JA, et al. Timing and duration of omalizumab response in patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Feb;137(2):474-481. PubMed 26483177
67. Fok JS, Kolkhir P, Church MK, Maurer M. Predictors of treatment response in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Allergy. 2021 Oct;76(10):2965-2981. PubMed 33539587
68. Niemeyer-van der Kolk T, van Maaren MS, van Doorn MBA. Personalized omalizumab treatment improves clinical benefit in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Dec;142(6):1992-1994. PubMed 30144475
1. Wills S, Chavez J, Grover A, et al. PD-BAT: A novel approach of pooling basophil donors for expansion of commercial laboratory testing of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. J Immunol Methods. 2024 Jun;529:113679. PubMed 38679364 2. Zuberbier T, Abdul Latiff AH, Abuzakouk M, et al. The international EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria. Allergy. 2022 Mar;77(3):734-766. PubMed 34536239 3. Kolkhir P, Munoz M, Asero R, et al. Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Jun;149(6):1819-1831. PubMed 35667749 4. Kaplan A, Lebwohl M, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Hide M, Armstrong AW, Maurer M. Chronic spontaneous urticaria: focus on pathophysiology to unlock treatment advances. Allergy. 2023 Feb;78(2):389-401. PubMed 36448493 5. Baldini E, Odorisio T, Tuccilli C, et al. Thyroid diseases and skin autoimmunity. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2018 Dec;19(4):311-323. PubMed 29948572 6. Kolkhir P, Borzova E, Grattan C, Asero R, Pogorelov D, Maurer M. Autoimmune comorbidity in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review. Autoimmun Rev. 2017 Dec;16(12):1196-1208. PubMed 29037900 7. Altrichter S, Peter HJ, Pisarevskaja D, Metz M, Martus P, Maurer M. IgE mediated autoallergy against thyroid peroxidase--a novel pathomechanism of chronic spontaneous urticaria? PLoS One. 2011 Apr 12;6(4):e14794. PubMed 21532759 8. Confino-Cohen R, Chodick G, Shalev V, Leshno M, Kimhi O, Goldberg A. Chronic urticaria and autoimmunity: associations found in a large population study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 May;129(5):1307-1313. PubMed 22336078 9. Bracken SJ, Abraham S, MacLeod AS. Autoimmune Theories of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 29;10:627. PubMed 30984191 10. Kaplan AP, Greaves M. Pathogenesis of chronic urticaria. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Jun;39:777-787. PubMed 19400905 11. Kolkhir P, Church MK, Weller K, Metz M, Schmetzer O, Maurer M. Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria: what we know and what we do not know. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jun;139:1772-1781. PubMed 27777182 12. Konstantinou GN, Asero R, Ferrer M, et al. EAACI taskforce position paper: evidence for autoimmune urticaria and proposal for defining diagnostic criteria. Allergy. 2013 Jan;68:27-36. PubMed 23157716 13. Schoepke N, Asero R, Ellrich A, et al. Biomarkers and clinical characteristics of autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria: Results of the PURIST Study. Allergy. 2019 Dec;74(12):2427-2436. PubMed 31228881 14. Sabroe RA, Fiebiger E, Francis DM, et al. Classification of anti-FcεRI and anti-IgE autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria and correlation with disease severity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Sep;110(3):492-499. PubMed 12209101 15. Maurer M, Altrichter S, Schmetzer O, Scheffel J, Church MK, Metz M. Immunoglobulin EMediated Autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2018 Apr 9;9:689. PubMed 29686678 16. Zuberbier T, Ensina LF, Giménez-Arnau A, et al. Chronic urticaria: unmet needs, emerging drugs, and new perspectives on personalised treatment. Lancet. 2024 Jul 27;404(10450):393-404. PubMed 39004090 17. Kolkhir P, Muñoz M, Asero R, et al. Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Jun;149(6):1819-1831. PubMed 35667749 18. Gimenez-Arnau AM, DeMontojoye L, Asero R, et al. The pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria: the role of infiltrating cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jun;9(6):2195-2208. PubMed 33823316 19. Hide M, Kaplan AP. Concise update on the pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Dec;150(6):1403-1404. Epub 2022 Sep 5. PubMed 36070827 20. Asero R, Ferrer M, Kocaturk E, Maurer M. Chronic spontaneous urticaria: the role and relevance of autoreactivity, autoimmunity, and autoallergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Aug;11(8):2302-2308. PubMed 36868473 21. Xiang YK, Kolkhir P, Scheffel J, et al. Most patients with autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria also have autoallergic urticaria, but not ViceVersa. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Aug;11(8):2417-2425.e1. PubMed 36805105 22. Deza G, Bertolín-Colilla M, Sánchez S, et al. Basophil FcɛRI expression is linked to time to omalizumab response in chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Jun;141(6):2313-2316. PubMed 29518420 23. Gericke J, Metz M, Ohanyan T, et al. Serum autoreactivity predicts time to response to omalizumab therapy in chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Mar;139(3):1059-1061. PubMed 27838346 24. Morones CA, Ferrucci SM, Moltrasio C, et al. IgG and IgE Autoantibodies to IgE Receptors in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and Their Role in the Response to Omalizumab. J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 3;12(1):378. PubMed 36615181 25. Schroeder JT. Basophils: emerging roles in the pathogenesis of allergic disease. Immunol Rev. 2011 Jul;242(1):144-160. PubMed 21682743 26. Fiebiger E, Hammerschmid F, Stingl G, Maurer D. Anti-FcεRIa autoantibodies in autoimmune-mediated disorders. Identification of a structure-function relationship. J Clin Invest. 1998 Jan 1;101(1):243-251. PubMed 9421487 27. Asero R Tedeschi A, Lorini M, Salimbeni R, Zanoletti T, Miadonna A. Chronic urticaria: novel clinical and serological aspects. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001 Jul;31(7):1105-1110. PubMed 11468002 28. Eckman JA, Hamilton RG, Gober LM, Sterba PM, Saini SS. Basophil phenotypes in chronic idiopathic urticaria in relation to disease activity and autoantibodies. J Invest Dermatol. 2008 Aug;128(8):1956-1963. PubMed 18356810 29. Sahiner UM, Civelek E, Tuncer A, et al. Chronic urticaria: etiology and natural course in children. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011;156(2):224-230. PubMed 21597304 30. Hide M, Francis DM, Grattan CE, et al. Autoantibodies against the high-affinity IgE receptor as a cause of histamine release in chronic urticaria. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jun 3;328(22):1599-1604. PubMed 7683772 31. Sabroe RA, Grattan CE, Francis DM, Barr RM, Black AK, Greaves MW. The autologous serum skin test: a screening test for auto-antibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 1999 Mar;140(3):446-452. PubMed 10233264 32. Konstantinou GN, Asero R, Maurer M, Sabroe RA, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Grattan CEH. EAACI/GA(2)LEN task force consensus report: the autologous serum skin test in urticaria. Allergy. 2009 Sep;64(9):1256-1268. PubMed 19650847 33. Hoffmann HJ, Santos AF, Mayorga C, et al. The clinical utility of basophil activation testing in diagnosis and monitoring of allergic disease. Allergy. 2015 Nov;70(11):1393-1405. PubMed 26198455 34. De Swerdt A, Van Den Keybus C, Kasran A, et al. Detection of basophil-activating IgG autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria by induction of CD 63. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Sep;116(3):662-667. PubMed 16159640 35. Jirapongsananuruk O, Pongpreuksa S, Sangacharoenkit P, Visitsunthorn N, Vichyanond P. Identification of the etiologies of chronic urticaria in children: a prospective study of 94 patients. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010 May;21(3):508-514. PubMed 19555353 36. Greaves MW. Chronic idiopathic urticaria. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Oct;3(5):363-368. PubMed 14501436 37. Kikuchi Y, Kaplan AP. Mechanisms of autoimmune activation of basophils in chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Jun;107(6):1056-1062. PubMed 11398085 38. Fiebiger E, Hammerschmid F, Stingl G, Maurer D. Anti-FcRIa autoantibodies in autoimmune-mediated disorders. Identification of a structure-function relationship. J Clin Invest. 1998 Jan 1;101(1):243-251. PubMed 9421487 39. Tong LJ, Balakrishnan G, Kochan JP, Kinét JP, Kaplan AP. Assessment of autoimmunity in patients with chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Apr;99(4):461-465. PubMed 9111489 40. Taskapan O, Kutlu A, Karabudak O. Evaluation of autologous serum skin test results in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria, allergic/non-allergic asthma or rhinitis and healthy people. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2008 Nov;33(6):754-758. PubMed 18954415 41. Asero R, Pinter E, Tedeschi A. 35 years of autologous serum skin test in chronic spontaneous urticaria: what we know and what we do not know. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Jan;55(1):4-8. PubMed 34904801 42. Fusari A, Colangelo C, Bonifazi F, Antonicelli L. The autologous serum skin test in the follow-up of patients with chronic urticaria. Allergy. 2005 Feb;60(2):256-258. PubMed 15647050 43. D'Auria E, De Amici M, Licari A, et al. Basophil activation test in children with autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria: Is it ready for clinical practice? Immunobiology. 2019 Jan;224(1):30-33. PubMed 30466958 44. Marcelino J, Baumann K, Skov PS, et al What Basophil Testing Tells Us About CSU Patients - Results of the CORSA Study. Front Immunol. 2021 Sep 28;12:742470. PubMed 34650565 45. Platzer MH, Grattan CE, Poulsen LK, Skov PS. Validation of basophil histamine release against the autologous serum skin test and outcome of serum-induced basophil histamine release studies in a large population of chronic urticaria patients. Allergy. 2005 Sep;60(9):1152-1156. PubMed 16076300 46. Rauber MM, Pickert J, Holiangu L, Möbs C, Pfützner W. Functional and phenotypic analysis of basophils allows determining distinct subtypes in patients with chronic urticaria. Allergy. 2017 Dec;72(12):1904-1911. PubMed 28585360 47. Curto-Barredo L, Yelamos J, Gimeno R, Mojal S, Pujol RM, Giménex-Arnau A. Basophil Activation Test identifies the patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria suffering the most active disease. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2016 Oct 4;4(4):441-445. PubMed 27980778 48. Netchiporouk E, Moreau L, Rahme E, Maurer M, Lejtenyi D, Ben-Shoshan M. Positive CD63 Basophil Activation Tests Are Common in Children with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and Linked to High Disease Activity. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2016;171(2):81-88. PubMed 27846634 49. Irinyi B, Gyimesi E, Garaczi E, et al. Extended diagnostic value of autologous serum skin test and basophil CD63 expression assay in chronic urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Mar;168(3):656-658. PubMed 22834727 50. Gentinetta T, Pecaric-Petkovic T, Wan D, et al. Individual IL-3 priming is crucial for consistent in vitro activation of donor basophils in patients with chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Dec;128(6):1227-1234. PubMed 21855127 51. Lourenço FD, Azor MH, Santos JC et al. Activated status of basophils in chronic urticaria leads to interleukin-3 hyper-responsiveness and enhancement of histamine release induced by anti-IgE stimulus. Br J Dermatol. 2008 May;158(5):979-986. PubMed 18341658 52. Yasnowsky KM, Dreskin SC, Efaw B, et al. Chronic urticaria sera increase basophil CD203c expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jun;117(6):1430-1434. PubMed 16751009 53. Szegedi A, Irinyi B, Gál M, et al. Significant correlation between the CD63 assay and the histamine release assay in chronic urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 2006 Jul;155(1):67-75. PubMed 16792754 54. Gyimesi E, Sipka S, Danko K, et al. Basophil CD63 expression assay on highly sensitized atopic donor leukocytes—a useful method in chronic autoimmune urticaria. Br J Dermatol. 2004 Aug;151(2):388-396. PubMed 15327546 55. Ebo DG, Hagendorens MM, Bridts CH, Schuerwegh AJ, De Clerck LS, Stevens WJ. In vitro allergy diagnosis: should we follow the flow? Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Mar;34(3):332-339. PubMed 15005724 56. Wedi B, Novacovic V, Koerner M, Kapp A. Chronic urticaria serum induces histamine release, leukotriene production, and basophil CD63 surface expression—inhibitory effects of anti-inflammatory drugs. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Mar;105(3):552-560. PubMed 10719307 57. Kolkhir P, Kovalkova E, Chernov A, et al. Autoimmune Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Detection with IgG Anti-TPO and Total IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Nov;9(11):4138-4146.e8. PubMed 34363991 58. Monino-Romero S, Hackler Y, Okas TL, et al. Positive basophil tests are linked to high disease activity and other features of autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Aug;11(8):2411-2416. PubMed 37286132 59. Pesqué D, Andrades E, Torres-Bosó P, et al. Relevance of the basophil activation test in a cohort of 240 patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2025 Feb 24;50(3):551-557. PubMed 39412151 60. Palacios T, Stillman L, Borish L, Lawrence M. Lack of basophil CD203c-upregulating activity as an immunological marker to predict response to treatment with omalizumab in patients with symptomatic chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 May-Jun;4(3):529-530. PubMed 26725153 61. Ghazanfar MN, Sand C, Thomsen SF. Effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous or inducible urticaria: evaluation of 154 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2016 Aug;175(2):404-406. PubMed 26972689 62. Cho CB, Stutes SA, Altrich ML, Ardonin SP, Phillips G, Ogbogu PU. Autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria and nonurticarial systemic autoimmune disorders. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Jan;110(1):29-33. PubMed 23244655 63. Weller K, Ohanyan T, Hawro T, et al. Total IgE levels are linked to the response of chronic spontaneous urticaria patients to omalizumab. Allergy. 2018 Dec;73(12):2406-2408. PubMed 30076605 64. Straesser MD, Oliver E, Palacios T, et al. Serum IgE as an immunological marker to predict response to omalizumab treatment in symptomatic chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jul-Aug;6(4):1386-1388. PubMed 29175369 65. Asero R, Ferrucci S, Casazza G, Marzano AV, Gugno M. Total IgE and atopic status in patients with severe chronic spontaneous urticaria unresponsive to omalizumab treatment. Allergy. 2019 Aug;74(8):1561-1563. PubMed 30801715 66. Kaplan A, Ferrer M, Bernstein JA, et al. Timing and duration of omalizumab response in patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Feb;137(2):474-481. PubMed 26483177 67. Fok JS, Kolkhir P, Church MK, Maurer M. Predictors of treatment response in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Allergy. 2021 Oct;76(10):2965-2981. PubMed 33539587 68. Niemeyer-van der Kolk T, van Maaren MS, van Doorn MBA. Personalized omalizumab treatment improves clinical benefit in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Dec;142(6):1992-1994. PubMed 30144475 |
References
Grattan CE, Francis DM, Hide M, Greaves MW. Detection of circulating histamine releasing autoantibodies with functional properties of anti-IgE in chronic urticaria. Clin Exp Allergy. 1991 Nov;21(6):695-704. PubMed 1723343
Hidvegi B, Nagy E, Szabo T, et al. Correlation between T-cell and mast cell activity in patients with chronic urticaria. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2003 Oct;132(2): 177-182. PubMed 14600430
Kikuchi Y, Kaplan AP. A role for C5a in augmenting IgG-dependent histamine release from basophils in chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Jan;109(1):114-118. PubMed 11799375
Knol EF, Mul FP, Jansen H, Calafet J, Roos D. Monitoring human basophil activation via CD63 monoclonal antibody 435. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991 Sep;88(3 Pt 1):328-338. PubMed 1716273
Niimi N, Francis DM, Kermani F, et al. Dermal mast cell activation by autoantibodies against the high affinity IgE receptor in chronic urticaria. J Invest Dermatol. 1996 May;106(5):1001-1006. PubMed 8618029
Sheikh J. Autoantibodies to the high-affinity IgE receptor in chronic urticaria: how important are they? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Oct;5(5):403-407. PubMed 16131914
Grattan CE, Francis DM, Hide M, Greaves MW. Detection of circulating histamine releasing autoantibodies with functional properties of anti-IgE in chronic urticaria. Hidvegi B, Nagy E, Szabo T, et al. Correlation between T-cell and mast cell activity in patients with chronic urticaria. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2003 Oct;132(2): 177-182. Kikuchi Y, Kaplan AP. A role for C5a in augmenting IgG-dependent histamine release from basophils in chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Jan;109(1):114-118. Knol EF, Mul FP, Jansen H, Calafet J, Roos D. Monitoring human basophil activation via CD63 monoclonal antibody 435. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991 Sep;88(3 Pt 1):328-338. Niimi N, Francis DM, Kermani F, et al. Dermal mast cell activation by autoantibodies against the high affinity IgE receptor in chronic urticaria. J Invest Dermatol. 1996 May;106(5):1001-1006. Sheikh J. Autoantibodies to the high-affinity IgE receptor in chronic urticaria: how important are they? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Oct;5(5):403-407. |
Grattan CE, Francis DM, Hide M, Greaves MW. Detection of circulating histamine releasing autoantibodies with functional properties of anti-IgE in chronic urticaria. Clin Exp Allergy. 1991 Nov;21(6):695-704. PubMed 1723343 Hidvegi B, Nagy E, Szabo T, et al. Correlation between T-cell and mast cell activity in patients with chronic urticaria. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2003 Oct;132(2): 177-182. PubMed 14600430 Kikuchi Y, Kaplan AP. A role for C5a in augmenting IgG-dependent histamine release from basophils in chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Jan;109(1):114-118. PubMed 11799375 Knol EF, Mul FP, Jansen H, Calafet J, Roos D. Monitoring human basophil activation via CD63 monoclonal antibody 435. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991 Sep;88(3 Pt 1):328-338. PubMed 1716273 Niimi N, Francis DM, Kermani F, et al. Dermal mast cell activation by autoantibodies against the high affinity IgE receptor in chronic urticaria. J Invest Dermatol. 1996 May;106(5):1001-1006. PubMed 8618029 Sheikh J. Autoantibodies to the high-affinity IgE receptor in chronic urticaria: how important are they? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Oct;5(5):403-407. PubMed 16131914 |
Custom Additional Information
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating mast cell-driven disease characterized by recurrent wheals and/or and/or angioedema.2,3 Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a disorder where symptoms of urticaria occur without an identifiable provoking factor and persist for more than six weeks.2 CSU is thought to result from the pathogenic activation of mast cells and basophils causing them to release histamine and other proinflammatory mediators.2,4 CSU frequently occurs in patients with autoimmune conditions including autoimmune hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, type I diabetes mellitus, Sjogren syndrome, celiac disease and systemic lupus erythematosus.5-8 The exact mechanisms leading to activation of mast cells in CSU are, as of yet, not fully characterized, but autoimmunity is thought to play a key role.2,9-15
There are two identified autoimmune endotypes of CSU with different types of autoantibodies that have been associated with the activation of skin mast cells.9,16-19 In both type I and type IIb endotypes, mast cells are the primary drivers and basophils are important secondary contributors. Type I and type IIb CSU patients share the same phenotype but may differ in disease course, clinical features and response to treatment.3 In contrast to classical type I hypersensitivity and allergy, which involve the development of IgE to exogenous allergens, type I CSU is characterized by IgE antibodies directed to self-antigens (also called autoallergens).7,11,20 Autoallergic chronic spontaneous urticaria is present in more than 50% of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.21 The beneficial effects of the anti-IgE drug omalizumab in many CSU patients further points to a role of type I autoimmunity in CSU.9,22,23
Type IIb autoimmunity, related to the presence of IgG autoantibodies against the high affinity Fc epsilon receptor I (FceRI) or, less frequently, to IgE itself, also has been implicated as a causative mechanism for CSU.2,8,9,11-13 The type IIb endotype is present in 8% to 40% of patients with CSU and is characterized by higher disease severity, concomitant autoimmune diseases, low levels of total IgE, elevated levels of IgG-anti-thyroid peroxidase, basopenia, eosinopenia, poor response to antihistamines and to omalizumab, and a good response to cyclosporine.3
A recent study found that the majority of patients with a type IIb profile also had a type I profile, suggesting there is greater overlap and heterogeneity in these "endotypes" than previously recognized.21 Another study suggest that patients who have IgG and IgE autoantibodies to the same autoantigen might more often be late or insufficient responders to omalizumab, as compared with patients with only one class of autoantibodies.24 In CSU, dermal mast cells and basophils express IgE receptors on their surface. Cross-linking of these receptors by an IgE/antigen complex or by an autoantibody can result in cell activation and degranulation.3,4,22
As is the case with many autoimmune conditions, the presence of antibodies to autoallergens or to FcepsilonRIalpha and/or IgE does not necessarily result in a disease phenotype. Antibodies to these proteins can be found in a number of other autoimmune disorders including dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, pemphigus vulgaris, bullous pemphigoid and in health controls.26 Consequently, only functional antibodies (i.e., those that cause mast/basophil degranulation) are considered diagnostic of autoimmune CSU.27,28 The autoimmune nature of CSU is further supported by the autologous serum skin test (ASST), an in vivo assay of mast cell activation induced by intradermal injection of a patient's serum into self.2,29-34 Nearly 50% of patients with CSU will develop a wheal-and-flare response at the point of injection when inoculated with their own serum. A positive ASST reaction in CSU patients has been found to be associated with the presence of autoantibodies against FcepsilonRIalpha in 30% to 40% of patients and/or against IgE itself in an additional 5% to 10% of patients.8,11,30-32,34-39
Recent guidelines recommended that the ASST test be performed in the diagnostic workup of CSU to determine the subtype of autoimmune urticaria.2 Unfortunately, positive ASST results are not unique to patients with CSU and have been noted in a substantial proportion of patients with allergic or nonallergic rhinitis, multiple drug allergy syndrome and even in healthy control subjects.40,41 Moreover, the positivity of the test has been shown to persist even when CSU patients are in clinical remission, particularly in subjects with autoimmune thyroiditis.42 The utility of the ASST is further limited by the fact that it cannot be used in patients treated with antihistamines, a status that is quite common for patients with CSU in clinical practice.43
Basophil activation testing has been shown to better identify patients with autoimmune CSU than ASST or individual antibody serology.13,44 An indirect assessment of functional antibodies in patients with CSU can been accomplished by in vitro measurement of the activation of donor basophils on exposure to patient serum.13 Historically, the measurement of the of inflammatory mediators (usually histamine) released by donor basophils has been employed as an indicator or basophil activating potential of the patient's serum in the CSU-Basophil Histamine Release Test (CSU-BHRT).45 A quantitative assessment of donor basophil activation by patient serum also can be accomplished by flow cytometric analysis of CD63 expression on the donor basophils in the CU-Basophil Activation Test (CSU-BAT).12,13,33,34,43,44,46-56 Incubation of donor basophils with serum from patients with CSU leads to increased CD63 expression in approximately 50% of cases.
Basophil activation tests are considered the best single tests for diagnosing type IIb CSU and showed better correlation with other markers of type IIb CSU and response to treatment than the ASST or immunoassays for autoantibodies.3,13,44,57 A recent systematic review of 42 studies by Monino-Romero and colleagues identified the basophil activation testing to show a strong association with higher disease activity in patients with CSU.58 There is a significantly higher prevalence of CSU-BAT positive results in patients with positive ASST results than in those that are ASST negative.34,44,54,59 Patients with positive CSU-BAT results tend to have a higher prevalence of other autoantibodies,34,44,46,47,59 more severe urticaria,34,59 and are more likely to have angioedema34,44 than CSU-BAT negative patients. CSU-BAT positive children have been shown to be more likely to exhibit an earlier spontaneous resolution of urticaria than CSU-BAT negative children.48 A positive basophil test has been linked to long disease duration, higher disease activity, a poor response to antihistamines and omalizumab, and a better response to cyclosporine and fenebrutinib.44,23,59-61
Omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the Fc portion of the IgE antibody, prevents free IgE from binding to high-affinity FceR1 receptors on mast cells and basophils. This drug has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CSU that is unresponsive to H1 antagonists.2
Total serum IgE levels are significantly lower in CSU-BAT positive patients than CSU-BAT negative patients as well as in ASST-positive vs ASST-negative CSU patients.34,59,62 Low IgE levels have been linked to lower rates of response to anti-IgE treatment in CSU patients,22,63-65 suggesting that type IIb CSU patients respond differently to omalizumab. Studies have segregated CSU patients treated with omalizumab into groups referred to as "fast responders" (subjects who show a complete response as short as three to seven days after the first administration of the drug; these represent about 60% to 70% of patients), "slow responders" (subjects who need three to five monthly administrations before showing a significant clinical response; about 10% to 20% of cases) and "non-responders" (about 10% to 20% of cases).23,66 Positive results in basophil activation tests and/or ASST have been linked to slower responses to omalizumab.23,59-61,67 The results of the basophil activation tests and autologous serum skin test are significantly correlated with the time to symptom relief with omalizumab.23 CSU-BAT is more specific for the detection of histamine-releasing autoantibodies in CSU patients than the ASST and may thus be a useful test in assessing patient responsiveness to omalizumab.23 As such, patients with refractory CSU may benefit from longer, more "personalized" courses of omalizumab.68
Results of CSU-BAT tests may help clinicians to set patients' expectations for therapy. One of the challenges in performing indirect BAT is the intra-individual variability in the response of donor basophils in the assays. While some donor basophils are highly reactive to pathologic serum samples, others are not. Conversely, some donor basophils are non-specifically activated by healthy control serum. In common laboratory practice, this variability in donor responsiveness is accounted for by testing patient samples with multiple donors in separate experiments.50 Arbitrary rules are established to assess the results when activation for individual donors varies.44-45 We have developed a procedure for prescreening individual donors and creating a pool of 20 selected blood donors to optimize the pooled donor basophil activation test (PD-BAT) assay performance and ensure similar results for samples tested from run to run.1
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating mast cell-driven disease characterized by recurrent wheals and/or and/or angioedema.
|
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating mast cell-driven disease characterized by recurrent wheals and/or and/or angioedema.2,3 Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a disorder where symptoms of urticaria occur without an identifiable provoking factor and persist for more than six weeks.2 CSU is thought to result from the pathogenic activation of mast cells and basophils causing them to release histamine and other proinflammatory mediators.2,4 CSU frequently occurs in patients with autoimmune conditions including autoimmune hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, type I diabetes mellitus, Sjogren syndrome, celiac disease and systemic lupus erythematosus.5-8 The exact mechanisms leading to activation of mast cells in CSU are, as of yet, not fully characterized, but autoimmunity is thought to play a key role.2,9-15 There are two identified autoimmune endotypes of CSU with different types of autoantibodies that have been associated with the activation of skin mast cells.9,16-19 In both type I and type IIb endotypes, mast cells are the primary drivers and basophils are important secondary contributors. Type I and type IIb CSU patients share the same phenotype but may differ in disease course, clinical features and response to treatment.3 In contrast to classical type I hypersensitivity and allergy, which involve the development of IgE to exogenous allergens, type I CSU is characterized by IgE antibodies directed to self-antigens (also called autoallergens).7,11,20 Autoallergic chronic spontaneous urticaria is present in more than 50% of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.21 The beneficial effects of the anti-IgE drug omalizumab in many CSU patients further points to a role of type I autoimmunity in CSU.9,22,23 Type IIb autoimmunity, related to the presence of IgG autoantibodies against the high affinity Fc epsilon receptor I (FceRI) or, less frequently, to IgE itself, also has been implicated as a causative mechanism for CSU.2,8,9,11-13 The type IIb endotype is present in 8% to 40% of patients with CSU and is characterized by higher disease severity, concomitant autoimmune diseases, low levels of total IgE, elevated levels of IgG-anti-thyroid peroxidase, basopenia, eosinopenia, poor response to antihistamines and to omalizumab, and a good response to cyclosporine.3 A recent study found that the majority of patients with a type IIb profile also had a type I profile, suggesting there is greater overlap and heterogeneity in these "endotypes" than previously recognized.21 Another study suggest that patients who have IgG and IgE autoantibodies to the same autoantigen might more often be late or insufficient responders to omalizumab, as compared with patients with only one class of autoantibodies.24 In CSU, dermal mast cells and basophils express IgE receptors on their surface. Cross-linking of these receptors by an IgE/antigen complex or by an autoantibody can result in cell activation and degranulation.3,4,22 As is the case with many autoimmune conditions, the presence of antibodies to autoallergens or to FcepsilonRIalpha and/or IgE does not necessarily result in a disease phenotype. Antibodies to these proteins can be found in a number of other autoimmune disorders including dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus, pemphigus vulgaris, bullous pemphigoid and in health controls.26 Consequently, only functional antibodies (i.e., those that cause mast/basophil degranulation) are considered diagnostic of autoimmune CSU.27,28 The autoimmune nature of CSU is further supported by the autologous serum skin test (ASST), an in vivo assay of mast cell activation induced by intradermal injection of a patient's serum into self.2,29-34 Nearly 50% of patients with CSU will develop a wheal-and-flare response at the point of injection when inoculated with their own serum. A positive ASST reaction in CSU patients has been found to be associated with the presence of autoantibodies against FcepsilonRIalpha in 30% to 40% of patients and/or against IgE itself in an additional 5% to 10% of patients.8,11,30-32,34-39 Recent guidelines recommended that the ASST test be performed in the diagnostic workup of CSU to determine the subtype of autoimmune urticaria.2 Unfortunately, positive ASST results are not unique to patients with CSU and have been noted in a substantial proportion of patients with allergic or nonallergic rhinitis, multiple drug allergy syndrome and even in healthy control subjects.40,41 Moreover, the positivity of the test has been shown to persist even when CSU patients are in clinical remission, particularly in subjects with autoimmune thyroiditis.42 The utility of the ASST is further limited by the fact that it cannot be used in patients treated with antihistamines, a status that is quite common for patients with CSU in clinical practice.43 Basophil activation testing has been shown to better identify patients with autoimmune CSU than ASST or individual antibody serology.13,44 An indirect assessment of functional antibodies in patients with CSU can been accomplished by in vitro measurement of the activation of donor basophils on exposure to patient serum.13 Historically, the measurement of the of inflammatory mediators (usually histamine) released by donor basophils has been employed as an indicator or basophil activating potential of the patient's serum in the CSU-Basophil Histamine Release Test (CSU-BHRT).45 A quantitative assessment of donor basophil activation by patient serum also can be accomplished by flow cytometric analysis of CD63 expression on the donor basophils in the CU-Basophil Activation Test (CSU-BAT).12,13,33,34,43,44,46-56 Incubation of donor basophils with serum from patients with CSU leads to increased CD63 expression in approximately 50% of cases. Basophil activation tests are considered the best single tests for diagnosing type IIb CSU and showed better correlation with other markers of type IIb CSU and response to treatment than the ASST or immunoassays for autoantibodies.3,13,44,57 A recent systematic review of 42 studies by Monino-Romero and colleagues identified the basophil activation testing to show a strong association with higher disease activity in patients with CSU.58 There is a significantly higher prevalence of CSU-BAT positive results in patients with positive ASST results than in those that are ASST negative.34,44,54,59 Patients with positive CSU-BAT results tend to have a higher prevalence of other autoantibodies,34,44,46,47,59 more severe urticaria,34,59 and are more likely to have angioedema34,44 than CSU-BAT negative patients. CSU-BAT positive children have been shown to be more likely to exhibit an earlier spontaneous resolution of urticaria than CSU-BAT negative children.48 A positive basophil test has been linked to long disease duration, higher disease activity, a poor response to antihistamines and omalizumab, and a better response to cyclosporine and fenebrutinib.44,23,59-61 Omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the Fc portion of the IgE antibody, prevents free IgE from binding to high-affinity FceR1 receptors on mast cells and basophils. This drug has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CSU that is unresponsive to H1 antagonists.2 Total serum IgE levels are significantly lower in CSU-BAT positive patients than CSU-BAT negative patients as well as in ASST-positive vs ASST-negative CSU patients.34,59,62 Low IgE levels have been linked to lower rates of response to anti-IgE treatment in CSU patients,22,63-65 suggesting that type IIb CSU patients respond differently to omalizumab. Studies have segregated CSU patients treated with omalizumab into groups referred to as "fast responders" (subjects who show a complete response as short as three to seven days after the first administration of the drug; these represent about 60% to 70% of patients), "slow responders" (subjects who need three to five monthly administrations before showing a significant clinical response; about 10% to 20% of cases) and "non-responders" (about 10% to 20% of cases).23,66 Positive results in basophil activation tests and/or ASST have been linked to slower responses to omalizumab.23,59-61,67 The results of the basophil activation tests and autologous serum skin test are significantly correlated with the time to symptom relief with omalizumab.23 CSU-BAT is more specific for the detection of histamine-releasing autoantibodies in CSU patients than the ASST and may thus be a useful test in assessing patient responsiveness to omalizumab.23 As such, patients with refractory CSU may benefit from longer, more "personalized" courses of omalizumab.68 Results of CSU-BAT tests may help clinicians to set patients' expectations for therapy. One of the challenges in performing indirect BAT is the intra-individual variability in the response of donor basophils in the assays. While some donor basophils are highly reactive to pathologic serum samples, others are not. Conversely, some donor basophils are non-specifically activated by healthy control serum. In common laboratory practice, this variability in donor responsiveness is accounted for by testing patient samples with multiple donors in separate experiments.50 Arbitrary rules are established to assess the results when activation for individual donors varies.44-45 We have developed a procedure for prescreening individual donors and creating a pool of 20 selected blood donors to optimize the pooled donor basophil activation test (PD-BAT) assay performance and ensure similar results for samples tested from run to run.1
|
Specimen Requirements
Specimen
Serum
Volume
1 mL
Minimum Volume
0.5 mL (Note: This volume does not allow for repeat testing.)
0.5 mL ( |
0.5 mL (Note: This volume does not allow for repeat testing.) |
Container
Gel-barrier tube or red-top tube
Gel-barrier tube or |
Gel-barrier tube or red-top tube |
Collection Instructions
If a red-top tube is used, transfer separated serum to a plastic transport tube.
Stability Requirements
Temperature | Period |
---|---|
Room temperature | 1 day |
Refrigerated | 14 days |
Frozen | 2 months |
Freeze/thaw cycles | Stable x3 |
Reference Range
|
|
||||||||
|
Storage Instructions
Frozen
Causes for Rejection
Specimen that are inadequately labeled, lipemic, hemolyzed, cloudy or microbiologically contaminated
Specimen that are inadequately labeled, lipemic, hemolyzed, cloudy or microbiologically contaminated |
Specimen that are inadequately labeled, lipemic, hemolyzed, cloudy or microbiologically contaminated |